## Not run: 

  library(agridat)
  data(bridges.cucumber)
  dat <- bridges.cucumber
  dat <- transform(dat, rowf=factor(row), colf=factor(col))

  libs(desplot)
  desplot(dat, yield~col*row|loc,
          # aspect unknown
          text=gen, cex=1,
          main="bridges.cucumber")

  # Graphical inference test for heterogenous variances
  libs(nullabor)
  # Create a lineup of datasets
  fun <- null_permute("loc")
  dat20 <- lineup(fun, dat, n=20, pos=9)

  # Now plot
  libs(lattice)
  bwplot(yield ~ loc|factor(.sample), dat20,
         main="bridges.cucumber - graphical inference")

  libs(asreml) # asreml4
    
  ## Random row/col/resid. Same as Bridges 1989, p. 147
  m1 <- asreml(yield ~ 1 + gen + loc + loc:gen,
               random = ~ rowf:loc + colf:loc, data=dat)
  
  libs(lucid)
  lucid::vc(m1)
  ##   effect component std.error z.ratio bound 
  ## rowf:loc     31.62     23.02     1.4     P   0
  ## colf:loc     18.08     15.32     1.2     P   0
  ## units(R)     31.48     12.85     2.4     P   0
  
  ## Random row/col/resid at each loc. Matches p. 147
  m2 <- asreml(yield ~ 1 + gen + loc + loc:gen,
               random = ~ at(loc):rowf + at(loc):colf, data=dat,
               resid = ~ dsum( ~ units|loc))
  lucid::vc(m2)
  ##                effect component std.error z.ratio bound 
  ## at(loc, Clemson):rowf     32.32    36.58     0.88     P   0
  ##  at(loc, Tifton):rowf     30.92    28.63     1.1      P   0
  ## at(loc, Clemson):colf     22.55    28.78     0.78     P   0
  ##  at(loc, Tifton):colf     13.62    14.59     0.93     P   0
  ##        loc_Clemson(R)     46.85    27.05     1.7      P   0
  ##         loc_Tifton(R)     16.11     9.299    1.7      P   0
  
  predict(m2, data=dat, classify='loc:gen')$pvals
  ##       loc      gen predicted.value std.error    status
  ## 1 Clemson   Dasher            45.6      5.04 Estimable
  ## 2 Clemson Guardian            31.6      5.04 Estimable
  ## 3 Clemson Poinsett            21.4      5.04 Estimable
  ## 4 Clemson   Sprint            26        5.04 Estimable
  ## 5  Tifton   Dasher            50.5      3.89 Estimable
  ## 6  Tifton Guardian            38.7      3.89 Estimable
  ## 7  Tifton Poinsett            33        3.89 Estimable
  ## 8  Tifton   Sprint            39.2      3.89 Estimable
  
  # Is a heterogeneous model justified? Maybe not.
  # m1$loglik
  ## -67.35585
  # m2$loglik
  ## -66.35621


## End(Not run)