Become an expert in R — Interactive courses, Cheat Sheets, certificates and more!
Get Started for Free

nosof94sustain

Simulation of CIRP nosof94 with the SUSTAIN model


Description

Runs a simulation of the nosof94 CIRP using the slpSUSTAIN model implementation and nosof94train as the input representation.

Usage

nosof94sustain(params = c(9.01245, 1.252233, 16.924073, 0.092327))

Arguments

params

A vector containing values for r, beta, d, and eta, in that order, e.g. params = c(8.1, 1.5, 9.71, 0.8). See slpSUSTAIN for an explanation of these parameters.

Details

NOTE: The underlying slpSUSTAIN function is currently written in R, and hence this simulation will take several minutes to run. slpSUSTAIN may be converted to C++ in a future release, which will reduce the run time of this simulation to a few seconds.

A simulation using slpSUSTAIN and nosof94train, i.e. a simulation of Nosofsky et al. (1994) with the Love et al. (2004) SUTAIN model.

Other parameters of slpSUSTAIN are set as follows: tau = 0, initial lambda = 1, initial w = 0, inital cluster centered on the first stimulus presented to the siumulated subject. These values are conventions of modelling with SUSTAIN, and should not be considered as free parameters. They are set within the nosof94sustain function, and hence can't be changed without re-writing the function.

The simulation uses 100 simulated subjects. Like the simulations nosof94exalcove and nosof94protoalcove, all simulated participants complete 16 blocks of training. This differs from the Nosofsky et al. (1994) experiment, in which participants are trained to a criterion of four consecutive errorless 8-trial subblocks.

The simulation by Gureckis (2014) builds this criterion-based training into their simulation by using a random number generator to turn the response probability on each trial into a correct or incorrect response. This feature of the Gureckis (2014) simulation is not incorporated here, because the instability in ouput this generates makes parameter optimization (e.g. via optim) less reliable.

A comparison of 10,000 simulated participants in the Gureckis (2014) simulation with 1,000 simulated participants in the current simulation reveals a mean difference in the 96 reported response probabilities of less than 0.01.

Value

A matrix of predicted response probabilities, in the same order and format as the observed data contained in nosof94.

Author(s)

Lenard Dome, Andy Wills

References

Love, B. C., Medin, D. L., & Gureckis, T. M. (2004). SUSTAIN: a network model of category learning. Psychological Review, 111, 309-332.

Gureckis, T. M. (2014). sustain_python. https://github.com/NYUCCL/sustain_python

Nosofsky, R.M., Gluck, M.A., Plameri, T.J., McKinley, S.C. and Glauthier, P. (1994). Comparing models of rule-based classification learning: A replication and extension of Shepaard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961). Memory and Cognition, 22, 352–369.

See Also


catlearn

Formal Psychological Models of Categorization and Learning

v0.8
GPL (>= 2)
Authors
Andy Wills, Lenard Dome, Charlotte Edmunds, Garrett Honke, Angus Inkster, René Schlegelmilch, Stuart Spicer
Initial release
2020-09-16

We don't support your browser anymore

Please choose more modern alternatives, such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.