Description

A slightly modified version of Novak, Smailovic, Sluban, & Mozetic's (2015) emoji sentiment data. The authors used Twitter data and 83 coders to rate each of the the emoji uses as negative, neutral, or positive to form a probability distribution (p_{-}, p_{0}, p_{+}) (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144296&type=printable).. The sentiment score is calculated via the authors' formula: \frac{∑{(-1*p_{-}, 0 * p_{0}, p_{+}})}{∑{(p_{-}, p_{0}, p_{+}})}.

Usage

Format

A data frame with 734 rows and 10 variables

Details

• byte. Byte code representation of emojis

• name. Description of the emoji

• id. An id for the emoji

• sentiment. Sentiment score of the emoji

• polarity. The direction of the sentiment

• category. A category for the emoji

• frequency. How often the emoji occurred in Novak et. al.'s (2015) data

• negative. How often Novak et al. (2015) observed the emoji being used negatively

• neutral. How often Novak et al. (2015) observed the emoji being used neutrally

• positive. How often Novak et al. (2015) observed the emoji being used positively

Copyright

2015 - Department of Knowledge Technologies

References

Novak, P. K., Smailovic, J., Sluban, B., and Mozetic, I. (2015) Sentiment of emojis. PLoS ONE 10(12). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144296

http://kt.ijs.si/data/Emoji_sentiment_ranking/index.html

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/