Determine optimal way to divide articles among 2 or more reviewers
This function takes information on the number (and optionally, identity) of reviewers and combines it with data on how it should be allocated to return a data.frame showing the proportion of articles to be assessed by each person.
allocate_effort(reviewers, effort, proportion_checked, max_reviewers = 3, precision = 2, quiet = TRUE)
reviewers |
Either an integer giving the number of reviewers, or a vector of strings giving reviewer names. |
effort |
Either a single number giving the proportion of articles to be reviewed by all reviewers, or a numeric vector giving a unique proportion for each reviewer. If the latter must be consistent with number given by 'reviewers' above. |
proportion_checked |
Numeric value giving the proportion of entries that should be screened by two or more reviewers. |
max_reviewers |
the maximum number of reviewers that should screen any single article. Useful for avoiding redundancy when working with large teams. |
precision |
Number of decimal places with which to report results. Defaults to 2. |
quiet |
Logical - should the function return a summary of the proportion of articles allocated to each reviewer? Defaults to TRUE. |
This function makes an attempt to return a sensible distribution of effort among a number of reviewers. If effort is given as a single value (or not provided at all), then the result is calculated exactly such that all proportions sum to 1. Conversely, if effort is given as a numeric vector of length >1 and contains a range of values, then the function tries to optimize the proportion of articles allocated to each person, while also matching constrains given by proportion_checked
and max_reviewers
. In this case, and depending on the inputs, it is possible that no perfect solution will exist, meaning that some reviewers may be allocated a higher proportion of articles than anticipated. For this reason it is often worth setting quiet = FALSE
when running allocate_effort
with variation in reviewer effort, to allow assessment of the results.
Invisibly returns a data.frame giving one column per reviewer plus an extra column of proportions. The reviewer columns are binary and show which proportions apply to each person or combination of people.
distribute_tasks
for how to use the output of allocate_effort
to split a dataset.
# import some data file_location <- system.file( "extdata", "avian_ecology_bibliography.ris", package = "revtools") x <- read_bibliography(file_location) # simple case - split evenly among 4 reviewers result <- allocate_effort(4, quiet = TRUE) # more complex - specify names and amount of overlap result <- allocate_effort( reviewers = c("john", "paul", "george", "ringo"), proportion_checked = 0.2, max_reviewers = 3, quiet = TRUE ) # most complex - specify uneven effort among reviewers (experimental) result <- allocate_effort( reviewers = 4, effort = c(0.9, 0.7, 0.5, 0.3), max_reviewers = 3, quiet = TRUE )
Please choose more modern alternatives, such as Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox.